GSA proposes changes to graduate housing policy
There's quite a bit of controversy happening over some proposed changes to graduate housing policy. The GSA is writing a proposal/response to a recent report written by the Graduate and Professional Student Experience Survey committee (website: http://graduatestudentexperience.ucsd.edu/). Their goal is to increase access to housing for incoming students, build more housing, and build a sense of community. However, some don't believe that the proposed changes will accomplish this or seek to accomplish this at to high a cost. What do you think?
Read the proposal below and share your opinions on it the the Grad Wiki forum: http://ucsdgrads.wikidot.com/forum/t-11121/gsa-housing-proposal#post-27566
--------------------------------------------------
Here's the proposal. You can review the raw data of the graduate and profession student experience survey on the GSA website: http://gsa.ucsd.edu
Graduate Student Association Supplementary Report on
Graduate and Professional Student Experience Survey
May 30, 2007
In light of the Graduate and Professional Student Experience Survey (GPSES) and subsequent committee report, the Graduate Student Association (GSA) submits the following recommendations for improving Graduate and Professional Student (GPS) satisfaction at UCSD. According to the GPSES Executive Summary, “over two-thirds of graduate and professional students are satisfied with their academic experience at UCSD, and nearly two-thirds would again choose to attend UCSD”, while “less than two-fifths find the social experience satisfactory and less than one-third find the cultural experience so”. Further, “only about one-third feel a sense of belonging at UCSD, and fewer than one-third find sufficient opportunities for involvement on campus”. Most disturbingly, “only 10% of graduate and professional students feel a connection to the campus community, and nearly two-thirds (64%) do not feel a connection”.
As active members in the GPS community, we are acutely aware of the availability of social and cultural activities for GPS, as well as the difficulty of recruiting participants and attendees for those activities. We feel that the issue is not a lack of programming or activities for GPS, but rather structural problems with UCSD policies that lead to a lifestyle disconnected from the campus community. Some of these problems are similar to those experienced by undergraduates at UCSD. However, many present unique challenges that require independent solutions for the GPS community.
In their report the GPSES committee identifies several areas of critical importance (among them community, housing, and communications) and both short and long term actions that can be taken to improve GPS satisfaction at UCSD. Most of the recommendations in their report are for high level structural changes within the culture and policies of the UCSD administration. Further, they identify in the appendices many concrete actions that can be taken in a variety of areas. The GSA feels that the issues identified in this report are very important, and many of the structural and cultural changes should be implemented.
In order to provide further guidance from the GPSES and committee
report, GSA has identified concrete actions that we believe would, if
implemented, significantly improve the GPS community in the next five
years. To facilitate accountability and clarity, we have separated our
recommendations according to the campus unit responsible and have
provided the most desirable five year implementation of our goals. The
administration should implement these recommendations using whatever
administrative
mechanism they see fit.
Affiliated Housing
The GSA identified the lack of an inclusive residential community
affiliated with UCSD as the most pressing issue restricting the
development of a GPS community. Current housing policy emphasizes
minimizing vacancies, providing housing preference
for senior GPS students and those with families, and funding each
housing project on an individual basis with little cross subsidization.
While these priorities are well intentioned, they have led to an
inequitable situation that is particularly difficult for
incoming GPS.
The GSA recognizes the residential housing community, particularly
for incoming graduate students, as vital for a GPS connection to
campus. Current housing policies give preference to senior GPS and
families, those with the least need to build external
connections to other GPS. Conversely incoming students are forced to
find housing in the San Diego area, frequently without knowledge of the
area or friends that can become roommates. Due to high housing costs
and limited availability of housing near UCSD, these first year
students often live far from campus with roommates that may not even be
part of the UCSD community. The long commute prohibits engagement in
campus activities that frequently occur at night. As a result GPS
engage the UCSD community
only within their department. In the housing communities standard at
most campuses, as well as for UCSD undergraduates, community develops
organically within first year housing, particularly within the first
few months of arriving at UCSD.
In order to improve community for UCSD GPS we suggest that
Affiliated Housing implement the following policy by the end of the
next five years:
• Immediately Affiliated Housing will be required to make it’s budget
comprehensible and available to any graduate student that requests it
• All reasonable measures shall be taken to cut costs at Affiliated
Housing such that housing opportunities can be expanded while
maintaining below market rents
• All newly admitted graduate and professional students shall be guaranteed housing in their first year of study.
• In order to minimize vacancy, students are assigned leases that last
one year starting in stages during the summer, and are required to
complete the full length of their lease or provide a qualified
sublessor.
— Students completing their degree do not need to find a qualified sublessor.
— Affiliated Housing will identify an eligible candidate who will then sign a
prorated lease that terminates the following summer.
• Every year those students that have been in Affiliated Housing the longest are not
allowed to renew their lease to make space for incoming students.
— Students that have been in Affiliated Housing for the same amount of time
are selected by merit
— Masters degree candidates are guaranteed one year of housing.
— A doctoral candidate student can choose to take a leave of absence from
housing, returning at any following year such that their number of years in
housing does not exceed the standard amount of time
• Housing is priced according to desirability, such that the demand for each housing
complex available is equal (market pricing).
— Housing should be provided for as many GPS as possible so long as oncampus
housing remains the most affordable housing in UTC
— New housing is built with floor plans with the highest demand
• The North Mesa complex is assigned as priority to family housing.
— Preferential placement in family housing is provided to single graduate
parents, followed by international couples with children, domestic couples
with children, international couples without children, domestic couples
without children
— Any remaining spaces are allotted to single graduate students on one year
leases
— Family students are exempt from the time requirements for other students
— All one bedrooms and studios are reserved for graduate couples
• North Mesa will retain current policies regarding quiet hours and alcohol
• All other units will have later quiet hours and will allow alcohol in common
spaces within reason
• GPS will be allowed to change roommates among students with remaining
eligibility without penalty
• Improve community spaces in Affiliated Housing, including but not limited to;
— Installing UCSD wireless access throughout existing complexes.
— Improving comfort in community rooms and adding more general
recreation options, such as installation of ping-pong tables or foosball
tables in several community rooms.
— Increase outside seating/gathering areas.
• First non-exec GSA rep to reply with comments to Doug gets a free dinner!
In order to implement these policies with a minimum of difficulty and the least
inequity for both current residents and incoming GPS we recommend the following
transition plan during the next five years:
• Commitments that UCSD has made to families and students granted housing on
preference programs shall be honored regardless of other policy changes
— These students must be grandfathered into any new proposal
• Rates should change at 10% a year (increasing for more desirable housing,
decreasing or remaining constant for less desirable housing) until demand for
each type of housing is equalized
• Beginning in stages in the summer leases will be of a one year length
• Current residents and those on the waitlist shall be limited to four additional years
of housing from the implementation of this policy
— Families and SHIP/SHORE students that were promised housing for their
entire stay will be exempt such that those promises are honored
• Incoming students shall be limited to three years in campus housing
• Families that apply for housing after this date are placed on the waitlist for North
Mesa, which is restricted to family housing
• New housing units should be planned in proximity to current housing at Mesa to
increase capacity by several hundred more beds
• Until the waitlist is eliminated the dates on the waitlist shall be locked such that a
student does not lose their place on the waitlist once they are accepted into
housing
• New entrants to the recruitment programs (SHORE) shall be limited to the same
term (two years) as other residents
These recommendations, implemented over a period of five years, would significantly
increase community, equitability, and availability of housing for all GPS at UCSD.
Comments
Thanks for putting this up! I had heard some about this, but it's nice to read it through. A few things on this proposal get me angry, though. The two things that get me the angriest are: 1) that families are made to live only in North Mesa and 2) that all incoming graduate students are guaranteed housing and have to leave after 1 year (I'll quickly respond to this 2nd thing: Are we undergrad freshmen living in dorms again?!).
Both of these points I think are part of the following statement (and following assumption) made in the proposal: "Current housing policies give preference to senior GPS and families, those with the least need to build external
connections to other GPS. Conversely incoming students are forced to find housing in the San Diego area, frequently without knowledge of the area or friends that can become roommates. Due to high housing costs and limited availability of housing near UCSD, these first year students often live far from campus with roommates that may not even be part of the UCSD community. The long commute prohibits engagement in campus activities that frequently occur at night." First, the first part of this statement about families getting preferences but being those least in need to build connections to the GPS community pisses me off! Are we saying that a sense of community (whatever that would look like at UCSD, I don't know) among a bunch of well-to-do single grad students is more important than providing assistance to families with kids and trying to get buy on grad student income? That's ridiculous. If I have to sacrifice my graduate "community" so that a family can have cheaper living, I'm willing.
So let me say a little more about this first point: the proposed changes regarding graduate families. What I cant understand is why in the world are families limited to North Mesa?! Families have the most people; The minimum family size is 2 (parent and child), and any single parent may need a roommate to help pay the rent. That's at least 3 people living in one unit, and North Mesa is the smallest!!! I cannot figure out why those who would have the most people living in a unit are forced to live in the smallest unit!! IF families are limited to one part of Mesa, it should be South or Central Mesa, which are larger. I'm quite angry about this part of the proposal.
About my second point, what makes the writers believe that it is living far from campus that prevents grad students from participating in campus activities? I doubt that is the (only) reason. I think many grad students don't participate in the activities because they are on campus, or related to school! Many grad (or any) students do not want to have 'fun' where they do work. I think it's very nice that these activities are put on -- I go to them, but then I don't really have a life outside of school so...hehe :-)
Anyway, more to the point about the proposed change to have all incoming grad students be guaranteed housing -- this proposed change seems unreasonable, particularly if those residents have to leave after 1 year. As I indicated above, a situation like this would make the grad housing have more of a dorm feel, rather than an apartment-living feel. One thing that makes graduate housing so appealing is that it is an apartment complex. This allows me, a resident (please don't now write me off as biased), to fix up my place and know that I will be here for a good amount of time. It feels like a home, which is what graduate students need. Many (most?) of us graduate students are in our late twenties or above and do not want to be moving in and out of apartment spaces. We want to be more settled, I would assume, so moving into a place and out a year after is just bothersome.
Also, what makes the writers of this proposal think that grad students don't live in La Jolla only because they don't get into graduate housing? I think a lot of people choose to live in south san diego because it's got more going on. La Jolla is boring and bland...
All in all, I feel like these proposed changes may not be addressing a large part of the reason students don't feel a connection to campus community. 1) I would guess many students don't want to stay in La Jolla or on campus after their work is done, no matter what! La Jolla's too stale, and campus is for work, not play.
I think the biggest problem with UCSD and La Jolla when it comes to social life/community is not the living situation. In other words, social life/community won't be improved by changing who can live where in La Jolla! The biggest problem is with the university and student population's apathy and homogeneity (not to mention La Jolla's!). Once those are lessened, then people may want to be more involved in the campus and city.
I know I wrote a lot. I get this way when things bother me. Erin, are you part of the GSA who wrote this proposal? Should I send this "rant" :-]P to someone in particular (perhaps this "Doug" who's mentioned in the proposal?)
Hope you're well! :-)
Couple things:
1) First off, it's a draft - the draft that came out of committee is being revised this week and going up to council to be voted on and amended later.
2) The North Mesa thing is out, I can almost promise. It was well intentioned (parents requested cheap rents and proximity to the playgrounds, and north is best at both), but many parents agree it's just too small for all families. There's another proposal to do parts of north and parts of central to give a choice, or just do something else entirely, or this might just get taken out.
3) It's not a single year in housing. The idea is that you'd get as much time as you currently would if you waited on the wait list, just at the beginning instead of at the end. Or since it seems to imply you can do housing later on, you could presumably still do it at the tail end. But it's trying to offer housing to incoming grads who want it, rather than making them go through the wait list.
Hi,
Many people have a lot of input on the proposal (and many are quite upset). I'm not a member of GSA. There was already a meeting where public input was given. GSA is in the process of revising the proposal based on that input now. If you have some ideas for the proposal, the best thing you can do now is to send written comments to your GSA representative who can bring them to the next GSA meeting. Also consider discussing the proposal on either the Mesa or wiki housing forum:
http://ucsdgrads.wikidot.com/forum/t-11121/gsa-housing-proposal
http://adambrown.info/mesa/